Microsoft vs TestDrivet.NET revisited

June 2, 2007 ·  


Here Dan Fernandez explains the technical reason Microsoft claims TestDriven is in violation of the EULA.

I had not understood how much of a hack the integration is. Hijacking a process and injecting code is not something you do by accident.

So my rule is in favor of Microsoft, but I hope they can solve it without taking TestDriven out of business.

Tags:

Comments

6 Responses to “Microsoft vs TestDrivet.NET revisited”

  1. » Microsoft vs. TestDriven.NET on June 2nd, 2007 8:17 am

    [...] This article is revisited here. [...]

  2. » Microsoft vs. TestDriven.NET on June 2nd, 2007 8:18 am

    [...] Jag har ändrat uppfattning, men orkar inte skriva om det på svenska. [...]

  3. shithead on June 12th, 2007 5:11 pm

    But is doesn’t violate the EULA shit head! Hacking != Illegal asshat!!

  4. Johan Idstam on June 12th, 2007 5:31 pm

    Well, he did go through lots to make it possible. I think MS could have solved this at lot nicer, but the EULA is so blurry it’s hard to tell what is and what isn’t allowed.

  5. Johan; thinking out loud. » Microsoft vs. TestDriven.NET on April 15th, 2008 8:43 am

    [...] This article is revisited here. [...]

  6. Johan; thinking out loud. » Moving to SharpDevelop from Visual Studio Express on April 15th, 2008 9:01 am

    [...] light of the recent controversy of using plugins in Visual Studio Express and getting some inspiration after listening [...]

Leave a Reply